Chris Marshall
2014-04-12 14:26:46 UTC
A recent bug report for PDL_BOOT, http://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/351/
shows a problem with the current (and long-standing) PDL_BOOT code but
I cannot create a failure. Just running the first example code from the
PDL::API
docs runs fine with not even an error.
The docs for perl_require_pv() show that it is correct to fix to use a file
path
rather than a module name as the argument, the problem with that is then
how does the path get set correctly that "PDL/Core.pm" can be gotten to
from the current path?
--Chris
shows a problem with the current (and long-standing) PDL_BOOT code but
I cannot create a failure. Just running the first example code from the
PDL::API
docs runs fine with not even an error.
The docs for perl_require_pv() show that it is correct to fix to use a file
path
rather than a module name as the argument, the problem with that is then
how does the path get set correctly that "PDL/Core.pm" can be gotten to
from the current path?
--Chris